SUBMISSION POLICY | Journal of Black Brazilian Researchers Association

Submissions

Online Submissions

If you already have a Username/Password for Journal of ABPN (Brazilian Association of Black Researchers): ACCESS

Need a Username/Password? GO TO REGISTRATION

Registration and login are required to submit items online and to check the status of current submissions.

Author Guidelines

The Journal of ABPN prioritizes the dissemination of original, unpublished works resulting from empirical research of an academic-scientific nature, involving reflections on the interests of the black population on the different levels of schooling and that contribute to an Anti-Racist Education.

For conceptualization, the LILACs criteria are used:

http://metodologia.lilacs.bvsalud.org/php/level.php? lang=pt&component=74&item=21

Papers submitted for publication must be unpublished and may not be in the process of being analyzed in another journal. They may have originated from academic papers and papers presented at scientific congresses, but the text will never be (wholly or partially) equal to those. In the case of papers presented at congresses, it is necessary that the submitted text be clearly an expansion of the initial work. Any submission identified as previously published in another medium or whose text corresponds to the paper presented at a scientific congress - that is, that can be characterized as autoplágio - will not be sent for evaluation.

Manuscripts must be unpublished, ie they may not have been previously published with attribution of DOI (Document Object Identifier), ISSN (International Standard Serial Number) or ISBN (International Standard Book Number).

Access the flowchart of the editorial process of Journal of ABPN.

We recommend that if the paper is the result of experimental studies involving humans, the opinion of the Ethics Committee recognized by the National Health Council (CNS) through Plataforma Brasil should be presented.

The Journal of ABPN adopts CC-BY 4.0 Creative Commons open licensing, so there are no costs for submission and publication of papers.

The Journal of ABPN mainly publishes papers in Portuguese. Manuscripts submitted in Spanish, French and English will also be published, without translation into Portuguese. The authors are responsible for the originality and veracity of the content presented in the works, as well as for the linguistic revision, which must be done before the manuscript submission.

The authors are responsible for the originality and veracity of the content presented in the works. The linguistic and bibliographic revision should be done before the manuscript submission. Authors should indicate whether research is funded and conflicts of interest.

The inclusion of new authors is forbidden after the approval of the paper. Upon submission, all authors must be nominated.

The interval of at least six months for the publication of papers by the same author will be respected.

The journal allows itself to make, during the review process, small formal changes in the text, respecting the style and opinion of the authors.

From August 2020, in the submission process it will be necessary to indicate the ORCID number of each of the authors. Access a tutorial for ORCID registration.

Note: This field is not yet filled in as a required item.

Formatting: The texts must be submitted in accordance with the following norms:

To publish in the Journal of ABPN it is desirable that the author or at least one author in the case of co-authorship is affiliated with the Black Brazilian Researchers Association. Not yet a member? Please log in here https://www.abpn.org.br/filiacao-1
Typed electronically in Word for Windows, OpenOffice or RTF, in A4 format, Times New Roman font, font size 12, line spacing of 1.5 and justified. The papers must respect the limits of 15 to 25 pages, counting on the bibliographical references. Reviews, interviews and other texts must comply with the limit of five pages.
Reviews of books, theses, films, hypermedia products, etc. must have their own title, differentiated from the title of the work reviewed. The work must be indicated below the title of the review.
The document must have no data relating to authorship placed on (name, title and e-mail). Since the Journal of ABPN adopts the double-blind evaluation system, there is no need to identify authorship in the text or in footnotes, nor in the properties of the PDF file. This information is included in the Journal System Registry and the publishers will add it after approval of the text. It is important to fill out the registration form properly with the following information: full name; institutional filiation or last professional occupation; city, state and country of the institution; highest degree (graduate, specialist, master/master's candidate, PhD/doctoral candidate), address, telephone, mobile, contact email.
Title: centered, bold, with initial capital letters, Times New Roman font size 14.
Summary: Abstract, resumé and resumen with up to 10 lines, with up to 5 keywords, mots-clés and palabras-clave. Times New Roman 11 font, simple spacing between lines, justified and block alignment. The title, the abstract and keywords MUST contain three translations: Abstract in English, Résumé in French, Resumen in Spanish.
The paper should refer to at least one citation of a manuscript published by the Journal of ABPN.
The texts can have illustrations, graphics, tables and pictures, being indispensable their numbering as well the mention of title and sources used at the legend. Images (photos or pictures) must have a minimum resolution of 300 dpi, in JPG, JPEG or PNG format. These elements should be inserted in the body of the text, whose legend should be indicated at the top with numbering (Times New Roman, size 12, bold) and its font at the bottom (Times New Roman, size 10), single spaced.
The notes should contain only necessary comments to the development of the paper’s concepts and not for bibliographic citations. They should come in footer, with all references to the usual sources. Footnote indicators should be placed after the score. For example: Joking or not, it is certain that the provincial authorities asked for the expulsion of this Haitian from Brazil.¹
Quotations of excerpts from works and documents should follow these standards, as follows: up to three lines should be included in the text in quotation marks. From four lines, you must separate the main text, typed into size 11, with an angle of 2.5 cm, without quotation marks at the beginning and at the end. In both cases, italics should not be used.
All citations must be accompanied by their bibliographic references in parentheses, with the author's last name, year and publication pages. Example (Walker, 2001, p.196).
The Bibliographical References should be placed at the end of the paper in size 11, single spacing, according to the following norms:

Sources: indicate, precisely, its origin in written, oral, iconographic and other documents. Sources should indicate in order, institution, fund, document and date in dd/mm/yyyy format (this format is valid for all dates indications).

Paper in journals: Example: ARAÚJO, Emanoel. Black Memories: the Luso-Afro-Brazilian imaginary and the inheritance of slavery. Estudos Avançados, v. 18, n. 50, 2004, p. 242-250.

Chapter in a collective book: Example: CUNHA, Olívia Maria Gomes. Created to serve: domesticity, intimacy and retribution. In: CUNHA, Olívia Maria Gomes and GOMES, Flávio dos Santos. Almost-citizen: post-emancipation stories and anthropologies in Brazil. Rio de Janeiro: FGV, 2007.

Book: Example: SOUZA, Florentina da Silva. Afro-descent in Black Notebooks and MNU Journal. São Paulo: Autêntica: 2005.

Dissertation or thesis: Example: REIS, Isabel Cristina Ferreira dos. The Black Family in the Time of Slavery: Bahia, 1850-1888. Dissertation (Ph.D. in History), State University of Campinas, Campinas, SP, 2007.

Website: Example: TRINDADE, Raquel. Solano Trintade, my father. Available at: www.quilombhoje.com.br/artigos/Artigos.php. Accessed on: 15 of December, 2009.

Papers published in minutes of congresses, symposia, etc: RODRIGUES, M. V. An investigation into the quality of life at work. In: ANPAD ANNUAL MEETING, 13., 1989, Belo Horizon. Annals […]. Belo Horizonte: ANPAD, 1989. p. 455-468

Legislation: BRAZIL. [Constitution (1988)]. Constitution of the Federative Republic of Brazil. Organized by Claudio Brandao de Oliveira. Rio de Janeiro: Rome Victor, 2002. 320 p.

The texts sent outside these standards will not be considered.

Conditions for submission:

As part of the submission process, authors are required to verify compliance of the submission against all eight items listed below. Submissions that do not comply with the standards will be returned to the authors.

The contribution is original and unpublished and is not being evaluated for publication by another journal; otherwise, it should be justified in "Comments to the editor".
The submission file is in Microsoft Word, OpenOffice or RTF format.
There is no data related to authorship in the document.
The text follows the style standards and bibliographic requirements described in Guidelines for Authors, on the page.
The title, abstract and keywords contain the three translations: Abstract in English, Résumé in French, Resumen in Spanish.
The text referred to at least one citation of a manuscript published by Journal of ABPN.
The author, or at least one author in the case of coauthoring, is affiliated with the Brazilian Association of Black Researchers
The submitting author represents all authors of the paper and, by submitting the paper to the journal, is ensuring that they have everyone's permission to do so. It also ensures that the paper does not infringe copyright and that there is no plagiarism at work.
The text follows the standard norm of the Portuguese language and was submitted to linguistic revision.

Copyright Statement

Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0 which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are authorized to enter into additional contracts separately for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
Authors are allowed and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (eg in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this may lead to productive changes as well as increase impact and citation of published work (See The Effect of Free Access).

Privacy Policy

The names and addresses provided in this journal will be used solely for the services provided by this publication and will not be made available for other purposes or to third parties.

Conflict of interest guidelines

The Journal of ABPN, aiming to ensure its reliability for editors, authors, reviewers and readers, adopts a Code of Good Practice. The code is based on the ANPAD Good Practice Manual (ANPAD, 2017) and the Main Practice from Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE).

Standards of Ethics and Misconduct

The Journal of ABPN follows a code of ethics that guides the community and addresses the rights and obligations of members to each other and to the public. Such a code seeks to maximize the benefits produced by this period for the improvement of society and the teaching profession of all concerned by limiting the actions that may serve the narrow interests of some individuals.

The following guidelines are intended to clarify a set of ethical guidelines for The Journal of ABPN editors, authors, and reviewers.

This material was compiled from the American Chemical Society's Ethical Guidelines for Publication, the Fapesp Code of Good Scientific Practice, and the publication of Antonio Marques da Rosa and Júlio Chachamovich in What does the excellence of a Scientific Journal R. Psychiatry. RS, 25 '(2): 253-256, May / Aug. 2003 available at: http://www.scielo.br/pdf/rprs/v25n2/v25n2a02.pdf

Rules of conduct on plagiarism and data forgery

In case of identification of plagiarism, manufacture, falsification, improper republication and simultaneous submission, the authors authorize the ABPN to make the event public, informing the occurrence to the editors of the magazines involved and to any plagiarized authors.

1.0. Plagiarism, defined as "the appropriation of another person's ideas, processes, results or words without due credit (Roig, 2006)", is not accepted in the Journal of ABPN. We consider plagiarism the copying of texts or phrases, word for word (or very similar), from any other author. Self-plagiarism, that is, the replication of texts or data from previous works by the authors themselves, with or without proper citation, is equally unacceptable. Reasonable repetition of some ideas and reordering of one or two sentences by the authors themselves is acceptable. Word-by-word replication of data or phrases must come in quotation marks and with due credit. It is equally unacceptable to suggest a novelty when the methodology or results have already been published by the author or any other author (Roig, M. Avoiding plagiarism, self-plagiarism, and other questionable writing practices. Available at: http://ori.hhs.gov/sites/default/files/plagiarism.pdf ).

The manufacture of data, or the "claim that data, procedures or results were obtained or conducted when in fact they were not" and falsification, or the "presentation of data, procedures or results in such a modified, inaccurate or incomplete way as to interfere in the evaluation of the true scientific merit of the research findings" (FAPESP - Fundação de Amparo to the São Paulo State Research, Code of Good Scientific Practices, São Paulo: FAPESP, 2012), by the authors, are unacceptable practices in the publications of the Journal of ABPN.

Ethical Guidelines

AUTHORS Clear and concise description of their contribution and their importance. Research detail to allow repetition by other scientists. Credits to previous work. Cite sources from current research. Avoid publication and multiple submission. Co-authorship: All authors must agree. It is the responsibility of the lead author: to include all who participated and to exclude those who did not participate; establish communication between editor and other authors. Anyone who submits an paper is making a contract with that magazine and accepts the imposed rules.
PEER REVIEWERS Provide objective and confidential assessment. The peer reviewer is released in the following situations: conflict of interest (personal, professional, economic); little familiarity with the subject; has already reviewed that text for another magazine. Confidentiality: Do not disclose the content or identify yourself as a reviewer to anyone, including the authors, without the permission of the publisher. Exception: When requesting cooperation from a colleague, you will be subject to the same rules of confidentiality. You should not copy material from text. Documentation: Provide written evaluation. Have the obligation to point out failures to mention relevant works or other authors, as well as to point out the scientific insufficiencies of the work.
PUBLISHERS Ensure the integrity of the scientific journal. Make the decision to accept or decline based on scientific criteria. Reasons for refusal: lack of originality; unreliability of science; absence of significant contribution; lack of clarity or inadequate presentation of the material. Confidentiality and impartiality. Editor's authority: It is up to the editor to make the final decision about what is published in the scientific journal and should exercise that power judiciously.

It is considered unethical conduct of the authors: to present non-existent data or facts, forged documents, deliberately distorted data and ideas or texts of others without authorship; omit author who participated in the paper; include author who did not participate in the paper; falsifying publication status. It is considered unethical conduct of the referees: to falsify or issue a lying opinion; delay the opinion; steal ideas or text from the manuscript. It is considered unethical conduct of editors: to forge opinion; lie to the author about the evaluation process; steal ideas or text from the manuscript.