10 YEARS OF AFFIRMATIVE ACTIONS AT UNEB: COMPARATIVE PERFORMANCE BETWEEN RACIAL QUOTAS STUDENTS AND THE OTHERS STUDENTS FROM 2003 TO 2009
Main Article Content
Abstract
The present article is the partial result of a research of survey, organization and systematization of quantitative data about the students’ performance that allow a evaluative reflection on the functioning of the racial quota system adopted by the Universidade do Estado da Bahia – UNEB, since 2002, as an affirmative action policy for entry into the university through the college entrance examination. We focus in the academic trajectory of two groups: a racial quotas student group and a group with no racial quotas students which concluded their undergraduate degrees in 2008, 2009 and 2010. We chose, initially, a sampling of undergraduate courses presents in three campuses of UNEB, divided between courses of higher and lower social prestige. The result of the study indicates that there is no significant performance difference between the racial quotas students and the others throughout the period studied, although there is a recommendation of preventive attention in the courses with higher social prestige, because, in general, independently of the racial quotas, there is a perform on the limit of the mean.
Article Details
Copyright Statement
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0 which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are authorized to enter into additional contracts separately for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (eg in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this may lead to productive changes as well as increase impact and citation of published work (See The Effect of Free Access).