ON THE (DIS)ENCOUNTERS BETWEEN PSYCHOLOGY, PUBLIC POLICY AND QUILOMBOLA COMMUNITIES: REFLECTIONS FROM A LITERATURE REVIEW
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article aimed to identify and characterize studies on the insertion of Psychology within quilombola communities, with an emphasis on work aimed at public policies and mental health in quilombos in Brazil. Therefore, a literature review was carried out using a qualitative approach. The articles were searched in three databases: PePSIC-BVS, SciELO and Google Scholar. In the search, the filters “Brazil”, “Portuguese” and the “period between 2011 to 2020” were used. It was found that there are few studies aimed at the production of knowledge in this area, both related to the work of Psychology and public policies on mental health aimed at the quilombola population. It was verified that there is a distancing of the work of Psychology in relation to the quilombola communities. This points to the need for training psychologists to work in these places, in view of their social and cultural specificities. In this sense, Psychology can assume the social commitment to contribute to the development of public health and mental health policies in these communities, creating strategies that reduce the impact of racism and ethnic-racial inequalities.
Article Details
Copyright Statement
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal the right of first publication, with work simultaneously licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution License CC-BY 4.0 which allows the sharing of the work with acknowledgment of the authorship of the work and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are authorized to enter into additional contracts separately for non-exclusive distribution of the version of the work published in this journal (eg, publishing in institutional repository or book chapter), with acknowledgment of authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are allowed and encouraged to post and distribute their work online (eg in institutional repositories or on their personal page) at any point before or during the editorial process, as this may lead to productive changes as well as increase impact and citation of published work (See The Effect of Free Access).